Posts by Videomaster

Dzinc said

O.o,...your keyboard is broken! o.O

vaynah said
When I render with AECS4 I use multiprocessing render, and in task manager it used up all of my CPU and almost all ram. Would CS5 , using the same amount, be still faster on rendering time?

If you have Core2D and 2GB of ram you probably wont notice any kind of rendering improvements. But If we talk about Core2D (or i5, i7) and more than 4GB of ram, You`ll be astonished. Simply 64bit application can use all your RAM (more than 4GB in case of 32bit application).

Sorry Efekt, I need to speak and there is huuuuge reason for that. After CS5 was released I didn`t think that we (my company) should move towards it. Why?! Because I was thinking that probably Is buggy, gruggy, sluggy and so. But we recently (about month ago) build project with some 4k videos with some kinda zoom`s and pan`s and so on,. . . and that project was intended to be project with “daily render” schedule. On CS4 we manage to bring down render time @ about 4-8 hours and that sounded ( and It still sounds ) paintfull. After we moved project for CS5 ,. . . guess what,. . . render time was 30-45 min. So,. . . If you calculate you will see enormous amount of saved time.

And as Tyson mentioned it`s totally “mind blowiiiiing”

CS5 is simply pumping out maximum of your ram and your CPU .

That`s why CS5 is “life saver”

SaurabhSharma said

Videomaster said

ENVATO according to my “This Morning” table

(edit: fixed link)

hahaha. And.. what do you do with that screw driver?

Actually when my DVD drive stuck, It requires some brute-force

ENVATO according to my “This Morning” table

(edit: fixed link)

felt_tips said

Videomaster said
,. . . maybe even Mr. Kramer has account on this marketplace.

Kramer’s spies are everywhere on Videohive. Each has the one simple directive: “keep them Optical-Flares-addicted at any cost”.

-f.

Yes, for sure,. . . and as You can see he got very professional and well trained spies.

EFEKT_Studio said

Videomaster said

MotionRevolver said
If it was a problem, or if we were breaking rules, I’m sure VC would have been all over this by now.

It’s good news for us though, because if they’d ask VH to remove every project using Optical Flares, the marketplace would be left with only a handful of legal files!

We love you Andrew Kramer!

Yeah, I agree with you. And, who knows,. . . maybe even Mr. Kramer has account on this marketplace.

Ok, ... you got me.. use the optical flares.

Thank You Mr. K. I really appreciate it.

P.S. Can I resell presets also?

MotionRevolver said
If it was a problem, or if we were breaking rules, I’m sure VC would have been all over this by now.

It’s good news for us though, because if they’d ask VH to remove every project using Optical Flares, the marketplace would be left with only a handful of legal files!

We love you Andrew Kramer!

Yeah, I agree with you. And, who knows,. . . maybe even Mr. Kramer has account on this marketplace.

EFEKT_Studio said
as I think deeper about this, we could say something like:

“Authors can use After Effects, but cannot build templates and sell them on videohive”

Statement from guys from Adobe

Yes, . . . but You can use it in “Home Entertainment” purposes. So, . . . you can build effects for your neighbours, family, cousins.

And btw, my uncle think that those jumping flares are awesome.

As I understand, I can use VCOF to make some presentation @ my younger brother in my house and even to make some DVD to my mom (If that is legal). Point is: “You can buy plug-in but you can`t use it!”

EDIT : Hey, my uncle just phoned me and he is willing to come at my place and see some flares spins around.