Posts by VideoMagus

HAAA , HERE IS REPLY FROM OUR PRIEST :

Hello, please understand the difference between Stock photography and Project file with placeholders. While in first case the actual material is sold for those that might need it – Project files just uses image placeholders to demonstrate what the template can do. There are thousands of images available from nearly every theme and they could be used to demonstrate your template equally well. Besides your template doesn’t have any specific theme that would demand the use of pictures with nudity.

You made a good decision picking your other images. Please replace that one in question as well and resubmit your preview video alone. Rest of your submission were fine and ready for approval.

Filips Baumanis VideoHive Reviewer

HMMM , MY OPINION :

Dear Mr.Filips Baumanis HOW YOU COULD DICTATE US WHO WOULD PURCHASE AND USE OUR TEMPLATES ?

This is absolutely universal template, useful for any custom slide show, artistic gallery, TV program opening, talk show intro, dramatic credits, commercial showcase, businness presentation, etc, etc… So I intentionally used various pictures simply to demonstrate that… And some of the potential customers may be would like to use it for the fashion, tourism, entertainment, night clubs, erotic dramas, if not to mention the escort services, sex-shops or any for other ‘adult’ industry… with some soft or hard nudity pictures… NOBODY see in that image any problem… ONLY YOU suddenly found it ‘not family friendly’... In that case the amoral is your personal ‘puritan’ or ‘taliban’ fantasy… And can’t believe that we need to start that funny ‘sexual revolution’ on VideoHive in 2012… And I would be happy to hear something from Envato ‘management’ as well… It’s pretty strange, when I’m asking Envato support to help me with the unfair reviewing, and they resend it back down to the same reviewer, isn’t it?...

Cheers, VideoMagus

Thank you guys for your ‘moral’ support!... Also I’ve contacted the Envato support, yet still waiting for a reply… I wouldn’t mind to change any other picture and any other detail in my template, but never with that absurd ‘amoral’ reason… Now is 21st century, not 12th… And again this image is from Photodune , so we def need some clear common all-Envato standards with the erotic genres… What is acceptable on one marketplace, must be acceptable on all… Cheers

TO MODERATOR : THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT MY ITEM REJECTION , BUT ABOUT ART EROTIC ON THE ENVATO MARKETPLACES IN GENERAL …

Hm, I usually have no time to discuss all the ‘hypercritical’ VH rejections, just following the instructions, while the recent one has pretty important ‘sexual morality’ aspect…

My dear ‘item Inquisitor’,

YOU WROTE :

Your item Twilight Showcase isn’t quite ready for VideoHive. This is the reason given by our item inspector:

We’re family friendly marketplace with minors around. Therefore some of your images can’t be accepted. Nudity, underwear, provoking poses are not acceptable. Please replace your second image with more general one.

MY TOPIC :

All the preview images for that my absolutely ‘innocent’ AE template I’ve recently purchased on the PhotoDune, where they previously had been accepted by strict PD reviewers, and there is nothing adult at all for sure… Or may be different Envato marketplaces nowadays indeed are targeted on the different customers of some special ages and minds, like PD – for ‘liberal seniors’ and VH – for ‘puritan teenagers’ ?... But VH previously had no problems in approving some nice sexual footage clips… Or that is a provocative ‘double standard’ issue?... Hey dear reviewers, that’s blessing to try to become more ‘family friendly’, just please don’t turn less ‘author friendly’, and don’t be holier than the Pope… Here is the link to the original mentioned ‘second image’ by Yuri Arcurs (one of billion with such ‘common nudity’ by other PD authors) – http://photodune.net/item/sexy-young-woman-in-bikini-posing-against-colored-background/213134

Come on, do we really need to discuss that funny ‘soft erotic’ on the VH forum?

Thnx, VideoMagus

Here is my temporarily ‘sex-rejected’ preview – http://youtu.be/L-fwWXrmHQM?hd=1

Applause!

Hmmm… My Motion Graphics file is already 12 days in the queue… Or this VH department is waiting for a new special reviewer?

Welcome to the VH 10K club, dude!... You are the real Pro AE champion!

felt_tips said

VideoMagus said
Hmmm… Back to the main topic… It’s not about quality, nor quantity, nor variety problems… But on the accident of the 3 absolutely obvious duplicated uploads… with very surprising indifference of the VH ‘officials’ and ‘community’ yet:
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/933491
http://videohive.net/item/family-life-indoors/976905
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/1722175

Actually, only clips 1 and 3 are the same (with different preview sizes).

The second clip is a different take of the same action…

Common Felt, after your sophisticated indulgence I bet for the 4th, 5th… and more copies next days… How many do we need to get the cheating?

Hmmm… Back to the main topic… It’s not about quality, nor quantity, nor variety problems… But on the accident of the 3 absolutely obvious duplicated uploads… with very surprising indifference of the VH ‘officials’ and ‘community’ yet:
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/933491
http://videohive.net/item/family-life-indoors/976905
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/1722175

I guess Maupa is fairly concerned on quality of some other’s files like the ‘Billy Goats’ serial… While I’m discussing not anyone’s quality and quantity, but the equity and responsibility of all the VH producers… and reviewers as well… BTW a few weeks ago my some pretty ‘cloudy’ and ‘bokeh’ loops were rejected with the strictly remarks that these videos are black-listed as over-saturated on VH… Ok… Understandable… I never mind to get rejected here as always welcomed somewhere there… But after that I see dozens of repeating ‘clouds’ and ‘bokeh’ are uploading on VH day by day… And numerous absolutely equally repeating ‘bugs’, ‘leaves’, ‘flowers’, etc… Earlier it was VH’s ‘golden rule’ of strict limit for 3 variations (not the renamed copies) per file… even of the excellent quality like most files of the mentioned Pressmaster, with all my respect… What the heck’s the ‘batch’ matter nowadays?

Hey VH, what’s happening with the footage approving?... Yes, some very, very, very good clips are uploading daily… but immediately getting lost among so many, many, many repeating files, previously could be accepted only in the ‘packs’?... And there are even a few times uploaded and approved absolutely the same files with no difference at all… sometimes just the changed file names… Are such tricks allowed nowadays for all VH producers or only for some chosen?
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/933491
http://videohive.net/item/family-life-indoors/976905
http://videohive.net/item/family-at-home/1722175